{"id":3379,"date":"2025-10-28T15:49:04","date_gmt":"2025-10-28T15:49:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/2025\/10\/28\/the-michigan-dailys-ranking-of-wes-anderson-films\/"},"modified":"2025-10-28T15:49:07","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T15:49:07","slug":"the-michigan-dailys-ranking-of-wes-anderson-films","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/2025\/10\/28\/the-michigan-dailys-ranking-of-wes-anderson-films\/","title":{"rendered":"The Michigan Daily&#8217;s ranking of Wes Anderson films"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>A number of magnificent auteurs broke out in the scene at the start of the 21st century. Blockbuster king Christopher Nolan has been dizzying and dazzling audiences since his debut, \u201cMemento,\u201d in 2000. Horror-turned-social-commentary powerhouse Bong Joon Ho finally got people paying attention with \u201cParasite,\u201d but he has been documenting the foibles of capitalism since \u201cSnowpiercer.\u201d And then, there\u2019s the science fiction enthusiast Denis Villeneuve (\u201cDune\u201d), whose subversive films have elevated the idea of what a modern blockbuster movie could be.\u00a0The greatest of them all, though, may just be a guy who\u2019s obsessed with symmetry.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Wes Anderson\u2019s style has become one of the most easily recognizable (and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.vulture.com\/2020\/05\/wes-anderson-movie-tiktok-parody.html\">parodied<\/a>) in modern cinema. He uses symmetric, centered shots, vibrant color palettes and that iconic <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tiktok.com\/discover\/wes-anderson-yellow-font\">yellow text<\/a>, to create films that feel like they take place inside a dollhouse or diorama. <\/p>\n<p>With the release of his most recent film, \u201cThe Phoenecian Scheme,\u201d over the summer, the Film Beat has decided it\u2019s time to decide once and for all which of Anderson films reign supreme. However, despite our fair and democratic system of voting, some writers were shocked, even horrified, to see where their favorite Anderson piece ended up, resulting in both supportive blurbs and violent refutations of our ranking.\u00a0So, for better or worse, here\u2019s the Michigan Daily\u2019s spectacular, phenomenal and totally-not-subjective Wes Anderson ranking that the world has been waiting for:\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Ben Luu and Isabelle Perraut, Senior Arts Editor and Film Beat Editor<\/p>\n<aside class=\"scaip scaip-1    \">\n\t\t<\/aside>\n<p><strong>Honorable Mention: \u201cThe Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar and Three More<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (2024) <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>How does a legendary director evade all the talk about whether he\u2019s too indulgent, too full of himself or too obsessed with his own style? By making a series of shorts in which the artifice, which once decorated his frames, define the formal language of the films, of course!<\/p>\n<p>In the aptly titled \u201cThe Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar and Three More\u201d \u2014 a feature-length compilation of four short films directed by Anderson \u2014 the auteur has decided to push his style to near avant-garde experimentation. Gone is dynamic scene blocking or elaborate dialogues that flow into one another; a person standing up straight and reciting directly to the camera drives the narrative. Gone is the slightly robotic affectation of Anderson characters \u2014 a cold delivery will do instead.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, these short films find Anderson once again adapting Roald Dahl stories, but with a disregard for conventional film wisdom. The short films feature characters narrating each line of dialogue with book-like, third-person attributions (\u201che said,\u201d \u201cshe said,\u201d etc.). Cheap-looking, set-like foreground and background elements highlight the artifice of film form \u2014 which Anderson seems intent on exploring.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"scaip scaip-2    \">\n\t\t<\/aside>\n<p>Be it boredom, curiosity or a jab at all the critics, the resulting compilation is wonderfully endearing. Anderson, in acknowledging and playing into the awkwardness of his stilted writing and scene construction as of late, ends up ironically making a digestible film that feels unforced and unencumbered. However, \u201cAsteroid City,\u201d for all its thematic import about emotional distance, is still emotionally distant \u2014 a conundrum which this series manages to side-step by not having any emotional depth at all. Relying heavily on visuals and Dahl\u2019s original texts, \u201cHenry Sugar and Three More\u201d is a surprising highlight in Anderson\u2019s late career.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<em>Senior Arts Editor Ben Luu can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:benllv@umich.edu\"><em>benllv@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<ol start=\"12\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cThe French Dispatch<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (2021)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>I hate to say it, but \u201cThe French Dispatch\u201d represents the worst of Anderson\u2019s style. In the film, the cracks in his iconic style become deep and unavoidable. His work appears as a cumbersome parody of itself, harming the overarching story rather than supporting it. His style has lost a sense of genuineness, instead feeling campy and akin to the recent social media trend of people \u201cWes Anderson-ifying\u201d their lives. It\u2019s overly complicated, full of rapid cuts and contains intensely obnoxious symmetry, building an elaborate, whimsical aesthetic that distracts from the actual story. It\u2019s a beautiful and vibrantly colored mess.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The film is further burdened by an unnecessarily large ensemble cast that collapses under its own weight. Anderson weaves so many threads together that they get tangled. It seems that he tried to write a story to ensure he\u2019d be able to fit all of his collaborators (and some newcomers) into one film. The narrative suffers as a result of this overly complex structure. Characters are underdeveloped and emotionally removed, storylines are half-baked and the pacing never seems to even out.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s no coincidence that this was one of the Film Beat\u2019s few unanimously agreed-upon rankings. It\u2019s beautiful, but hollow. It\u2019s Anderson\u2019s homage to his own style. Like an absent-minded look of admiration in a mirror, \u201cThe French Dispatch\u201d<em> <\/em>is the perfect reflection of all of Anderson\u2019s flaws as a filmmaker.\u00a0<\/p>\n<aside class=\"scaip scaip-3    \">\n\t\t<\/aside>\n<p><em>Film Beat Editor Isabelle Perraut can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:iperraut@umich.edu\"><em>iperraut@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<ol start=\"11\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cAsteroid City<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (2023)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Late-style Anderson (that is, everything since \u201cThe French Dispatch\u201d) has its fair share of detractors. Anderson\u2019s success and army of cinephile fans has transformed his style into a recognizable trademark and source of endless parody. Rather than departing from his style, the filmmaker leaned into it even further, stretching his visual language to its formal and emotional limits. No film of his epitomizes this phenomenon more than \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/asteroid-city-is-too-spaced-out-to-be-grounded-in-anything\/\">Asteroid City<\/a>.\u201d The film is a play within a documentary within a movie; its actors are actors playing characters turned actors once again. Critics have decried the film with a <a href=\"https:\/\/vanyaland.com\/2023\/06\/23\/asteroid-city-review-the-tragedy-of-wes-anderson\/\">menagerie<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/time.com\/6281902\/asteroid-city-review\/\">of insults<\/a>: it\u2019s a self-parody, cold, distant or simply <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=0pnwE_Oy5WI\">insists upon itself<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>However, I write this blurb as an impassioned defense of \u201cAsteroid City,\u201d as my well-intentioned yet misguided Film Beat brethren exile it to this undeserved subaltern position. Yes, it is true that \u201cAsteroid City\u201d reflects the most stylized <a href=\"https:\/\/www.backstage.com\/magazine\/article\/mise-en-scene-definition-examples-75967\/\">mise-en-sc\u00e8ne<\/a> of any of his films. The artificial set of the diegetic play makes the film\u2019s aesthetic further from the real world than his have ever been. But the fundamental motivating force behind criticism of \u201cAsteroid City\u201d \u2014 that Anderson\u2019s style overshadows any semblance of emotional core \u2014 is missing the point. The emotional distance between audience and character is more of an intentional feature than a bug; by centering the story around artists making a work of art they don\u2019t understand, \u201cAsteroid City\u201d is Anderson questioning his own commitment to craft. This self-analysis of artistry and meaning makes it one of Anderson\u2019s <em>most<\/em> personal. What does the play mean? What\u2019s up with that alien? Does any of this matter? Anderson doesn\u2019t pretend to know the answer to any of these questions, but he keeps on asking. \u201cAsteroid City\u201d may have its haters, but I find it to be one of Anderson\u2019s most self-aware and emotionally resonant films to date.<\/p>\n<p><em>Daily Arts Writer Will Cooper can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:wcoop@umich.edu\"><em>wcoop@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<ol start=\"10\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cThe Phoenician Scheme<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (2025)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>There are plenty of reasons why \u201cThe Phoenician Scheme\u201d ranked this low. For starters, it\u2019s Anderson\u2019s most recent release, so it\u2019s possible that many of my fellow Film Beat writers have not gotten around to seeing it. It\u2019s also possible that people don\u2019t rock with late-stage Anderson and his overt stylization. Or maybe people are tired of his aesthetic. Whatever the reason may be, I simply do not care \u2014 \u201cThe Phoenician Scheme\u201d is great, and deserves to be in the upper echelon of his films. Despite being in the later part of his career, \u201cThe Phoenician Scheme\u201d is very much a return to form for Anderson. He departs from ensemble works to revisit a formula that has worked for him time and time again: narratives centered around family. As with many of his films, especially his recent work, Anderson has been <a href=\"https:\/\/www.strikemagazines.com\/blog-2-1\/style-over-substance-the-wes-anderson-aesthetic\">criticized<\/a> for prioritizing \u201cstyle over substance,\u201d but this simply isn\u2019t the case here. Sure, his aesthetics have been dialed up a notch, but the emotional core \u2014 the father-daughter relationship \u2014 is what defines the film. Beneath the schemes, assassination attempts and espionage, the film is really about a father\u2019s struggle to balance his work life and personal life. It seems to serve as a reflection for Anderson on managing the roles of both a working director and a parent, resulting in one of the most beautiful narratives in his filmography. As I noted in my <a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-phoenician-scheme-and-the-brilliance-of-late-stage-wes-anderson\/\">review<\/a> of the film, \u201cThe Phoenician Scheme\u201d is Anderson at his most personal, and that\u2019s what makes it one of his best.\u00a0<\/p>\n<aside class=\"scaip scaip-4    \">\n\t\t<\/aside>\n<p><em>Daily Arts Writer\u00a0JC Rafal can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:rafaljc@umich.edu\"><em>rafaljc@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<ol start=\"9\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cThe Darjeeling Limited<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (2007)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Nine out of twelve \u2026 wow. Surprisingly, this was my number one Anderson film. I thought my number one would be \u201cThe Grand Budapest Hotel\u201d or \u201cAsteroid City\u201d (look, I really liked seeing Anderson get formally experimental), but as I crossed out more and more titles to find my winner, I realized I couldn\u2019t let go of \u201cThe Darjeeling Limited.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The key to what makes \u201cThe Darjeeling Limited\u201d special is a deviation from the script common to Anderson. Anderson\u2019s films \u2014 take \u201cThe Royal Tenenbaums,\u201d for example \u2014 tend to focus on a group\u2019s bond becoming tighter over the course of a film. \u201cThe Darjeeling Limited\u201d subverts this expectation. Rather than reconnecting with their mother, Patricia (Anjelica Huston, \u201cThe Addams Family\u201d), the brothers are truly orphaned at the end of the film; after losing their father, their mother chooses again to take off in the night, leaving the brothers to return stateside from India alone.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The brothers \u2014 the original family we began with \u2014 certainly grow closer. But unlike Anderson\u2019s other films, the bonding ends there. The film builds to a reunion that doesn\u2019t really happen. It\u2019s a bittersweet ending, like other Anderson films, but a less fantastic and more challenging one. The cycle isn\u2019t broken, people don\u2019t change themselves after decades of living a certain way and life goes on. The brothers come to accept their mother for who she is, not love her for who she isn\u2019t. It\u2019s that maturity that\u2019s kept \u201cThe Darjeeling Limited\u201d in my heart for so long.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><em>Daily Arts Writer Max Resch can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:nataljo@umich.edu\"><em>nataljo@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<aside class=\"scaip scaip-5    \">\n\t\t<\/aside>\n<ol start=\"8\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cBottle Rocket<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (1996)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>As far as debuts go, Anderson\u2019s \u201cBottle Rocket\u201d is a solid movie. However, it makes sense that among his other movies, it ranks in the high end of the bottom tier. In \u201cBottle Rocket,\u201d you can see the beginnings of the unique style that he will become famous for, but he hasn\u2019t fully fleshed it out yet. I think if someone saw this eccentric and campy film without knowing it was by Anderson, they would notice certain similarities, but wouldn\u2019t be able to pinpoint him as the director.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBottle Rocket\u201d focuses on the bungled crime sprees of a trio of friends, Dignan, Anthony and Bob, played by Owen Wilson (\u201cZoolander\u201d), Luke Wilson (\u201cLegally Blonde\u201d) and Robert Musgrave (\u201cIdiocracy\u201d), respectively. Most of Anderson\u2019s movies include a mix of humor and heartfelt emotion from a quirky cast of characters, and while \u201cBottle Rocket\u201d has moments of hilarity to spare, it doesn\u2019t delve too deep into the emotions of any of the characters.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>I think \u201cBottle Rocket\u201d is most entertaining and useful as a way to see how Anderson has developed with age and experience, and allows for a fuller enjoyment of his later works. On its own, the movie is still worth a watch with the funny, deadpan idiocy of the three friends, but if you\u2019re looking for an Anderson film with a bit more emotional substance, I\u2019d pick a movie higher on the list.<\/p>\n<p><em>Daily Arts Contributor Maeve McGinn can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:maevemcg@umich.edu\"><em>maevemcg@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<ol start=\"7\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cIsle of Dogs<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (2018)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Despite its <a href=\"https:\/\/movieweb.com\/fantastic-mr-fox-vs-isle-of-dogs-which-is-better\/\">praise<\/a> for having more complex and sophisticated stop motion animation, \u201cIsle of Dogs\u201d ended up lower than \u201cFantastic Mr. Fox\u201d in our ranking. Instead of driving the story forward with its characters like a typical Anderson film, \u201cIsle of Dogs\u201d focuses on the plot \u2014 one that\u2019s loaded with societal commentary.\u00a0<\/p>\n<aside class=\"scaip scaip-6    \">\n\t\t<\/aside>\n<p>There\u2019s nothing inherently wrong with experimenting with different storytelling methods, especially one that serves as a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/culture\/richard-brody\/isle-of-dogs-is-a-stylish-revolt-against-american-political-madness#:~:text=From%20its%20basic%20setup%2C%20%E2%80%9CIsle,to%20die%20from%20malign%20neglect.\">metaphor<\/a> for modern-day politics. While \u201cIsle of Dogs\u201d captivated me with its intricate set design, kept my attention with its diverse soundscape and made me laugh with its dry comedy, it also left me with a sense of unease at how neatly the end was tied together.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIsle of Dogs\u201d isn\u2019t the type of film to be classified as style over substance, as it still gracefully explored themes of loyalty, friendship and justice through a fictionalized story about dogs and a future-state Japan. However, it did leave me questioning how it tackled nuanced issues like government corruption and prejudice with such simplicity: How was the mayor able to change his mind about a major conspiracy he worked so hard to disseminate over a child\u2019s heartfelt haiku? How was Chief (Bryan Cranston, \u201cBreaking Bad\u201d) convinced to shed his hard-shelled stray dog attitude toward humans after just one bath from Atari (Kuyo Rankin, \u201cDead Boy Detectives\u201d)?\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>To shift one\u2019s political ideology and to unpack trauma takes time, and due to the lack of character development, these transformations seemed all too easy to feel real. Even when a character was presented with teary, glossed-over eyes, I didn\u2019t feel that I knew them well enough to empathize with their emotions through the screen.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Dogs are known to be man\u2019s best friend, but I doubt such a deep-rooted relationship could be forged through one little biscuit.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><em>TV Beat Editor Michelle Wu can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:michewu@umich.edu\"><em>michewu@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<ol start=\"6\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cThe Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (2004)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>If I dare be so bold, I\u2019ll make a claim: \u201cThe Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou\u201d is the second-to-last film before Anderson began a campaign of symmetry which would quickly turn into his trademark \u2014 to the extent of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=JpLmMnsUeck\">parody<\/a> and criticism, even. And if I dare be bolder, \u201cLife Aquatic\u201d is my favorite Anderson film. The film is as loose as \u201cThe Darjeeling Limited\u201d and \u201cRushmore\u201d but with the refined and wacky sensibilities of late Anderson hits like \u201cThe Grand Budapest Hotel.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve always struggled with diagnosing what makes or breaks Anderson movies, and the best conclusion I\u2019ve reached is that his films fall apart when his style limits expression, instead of aiding it, or when he\u2019s using the style to supplement a lackluster story. With \u201cSteve Zissou,\u201d Anderson\u2019s offbeat nature is a wonderful decoration on top of a solid, heartfelt story. Following oceanographer Steve Zissou (Bill Murray, \u201cGroundhog Day\u201d) as he completes one last adventure, the film is part sea-trip, part reflection on old age and part family drama. And I can\u2019t help finding it utterly ridiculous, infectiously so.<\/p>\n<p>Murray delivers an outstanding performance as the washed adventurer, crafting a charming character with a bit of a rugged edge. I love the way Murray no-sells comedic moments with his blank, downtrodden expression. The ensemble, especially the random cameo appearances by Seu Jorge (\u201cCarolina\u201d), adds just that extra layer of charm \u2014 of a band getting back together for the last time \u2014 that feels both wistful and jovial. It is equally fitting that the soundtrack to such an adventure consists of calm, acoustic David Bowie covers, hammering home a sense of a bygone time.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>If you don\u2019t buy into the film\u2019s offbeat nature and triviality, it would make sense why it ranks in the middle of the pack. I, however, do, and I\u2019ll happily enjoy my voyage under the sea with my pal Steve Zissou.<\/p>\n<p><em>Senior Arts Editor Ben Luu can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:benllv@umich.edu\"><em>benllv@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cRushmore<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (1998)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>As Anderson\u2019s second film, \u201cRushmore\u201d marked a number of firsts. His first use of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.studiobinder.com\/blog\/what-is-a-static-shot-definition\/\">static framing<\/a> and symmetry, his first of many collaborations with Bill Murray and Jason Schwartzman and his first to achieve the balance between emotions and ridiculousness. \u201cRushmore\u201d marks a transition for the director as he comes into his own style.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRushmore\u201d is the rebellious teenager of Anderson\u2019s filmography: loud and unapologetic. Set at the prestigious Rushmore Academy, the film literally follows a rebellious teenager navigating the overpowering ambition and boldness that often get him in trouble. The soundtrack is full of British Invasion rock, embracing the frustrations of being a teenager and the feeling of growing up and changing in a world that seems to be stuck in its ways.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a heartwarming coming-of-age story that walks the fine line between realism, irony and artifice. Parts of the movie are unrealistic and ridiculous, but through his carefully crafted characters and cinematography, Anderson manages to maintain the necessary emotional weight for the film to have an impact.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRushmore\u201d isn\u2019t without its flaws. The treatment of the only important female character in this film leaves something to be desired, and it brings up a number of emotional issues that aren\u2019t satisfyingly resolved. \u201cRushmore\u201d is centered in boyhood. It\u2019s loud, emotional, flawed and not Anderson\u2019s best work. But it\u2019s an excellent second film.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><em>Film Beat Editor Isabelle Perraut can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:iperraut@umich.edu\"><em>iperraut@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cRoyal Tenenbaums<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (2001)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Wow. The people have voted and the people love \u201cThe Royal Tenenbaums.\u201d And I hate to say it, but this is not going to be an agreement blurb. Anderson\u2019s third film is certainly one of his more stylistically subdued films, but what it lacks in aesthetics, it does not make up for in storytelling.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Royal Tenenbaums\u201d is your classic drama about a large family with three extraordinary kids. They all have extremely bright futures, until a classic case of gifted kid burnout strikes them all. Every character is aloof in their own odd way which, in moments, can seem charming, but for the majority of the film is off-putting. The story follows the family\u2019s reunion 22 years later, particularly the three children\u2019s experiences returning home and reconciling their childhood successes with their adult failures, the crux of Anderson\u2019s half-fleshed-out message.<\/p>\n<p>The problem I have with \u201cThe Royal Tenenbaums\u201d is that alongside its reliance on classic Anderson aesthetics, it also relies on specific character relationships \u2014 ones that I don\u2019t particularly like. One of the brothers is in love with his adopted sister and has been since they were kids. Their interactions feel withdrawn, showing little emotion, neither love nor disgust. This is supposed to be the complicated human allure of their characters, but for me, it just didn\u2019t work. This issue is consistent with all the other family members, as no one character gives another the satisfaction of an emotional reaction. By the end, I was tired of reading between the lines, watching withdrawn family members sulk alone and eventually sulk together. <\/p>\n<p><em>Daily Arts Writer Abigail Weinberg can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:weinab@umich.edu\"><em>weinab@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cMoonrise Kingdom<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (2012)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Anderson\u2019s filmography is not fundamentally romantic. Though if you look close enough, romance is just as much of an identifying characteristic of Anderson\u2019s art as is distinctive camera language, Art Nouveau visual inspirations, strange characters and even stranger speech patterns. Anderson\u2019s films concern themselves with damaged men and women, often the troubled relations between them. There is the carousel of love between Zero (Tony Revolori, \u201cSpiderman: Homecoming<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em>) and Agatha (Saoirse Ronan, \u201cLittle Women<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em>) in \u201cThe Grand Budapest Hotel,\u201d the ludic and steadfast marriage between Mr. (George Clooney, \u201cER<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em>) and Mrs. Fox (Meryl Streep, \u201cThe Devil Wears Prada<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> in \u201cFantastic Mr. Fox\u201d and the romance beyond language between \u201cBottle Rocket\u2019s\u201d Anthony (Luke Wilson, \u201cLegally Blonde<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em>) and Inez (Lumi Cavazos, \u201cLike Water for Chocolate<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em>). However, the greatest romance of them all belongs to young Suzy Bishop (Kara Hayward, \u201cManchester by the Sea\u201d) and Sam Shakusky (Jared Gilman, \u201cPaterson\u201d).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMoonrise Kingdom\u201d is a love story of many love stories. One between Suzy and Sam, another between Captain Sharp (Bruce Willis, \u201cDie Hard\u201d) and Mrs. Bishop (Frances McDormand, \u201cNomadland\u201d). My favorite of them all, however, is the invisible tenderness and tension between adulthood and childhood. Suzy and Sam flee their homes and journey to an isolated beach they claim and call \u201cMoonrise Kingdom.\u201d It is from this eternal kingdom that they are forcibly torn by the adults they ran from. Adulthood, as it is in nearly every Anderson film, is an ugly presence. The adults of \u201cMoonrise Kingdom\u201d suffer from depression and loneliness, grappling with their envy for the pureness of Suzy and Sam\u2019s love and their hatred for the impurities of their own.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Benjamin Britten\u2019s (\u201cNight Mail\u201d) music is used throughout \u201cMoonrise Kingdom,\u201d evoking the wonder and playfulness of childhood. \u201cCuckoo!\u201d is perhaps the most effective piece of Britten\u2019s discography used in the film. A children\u2019s choir sings, \u201cIn April, I open my bill \/ In May, I sing night and day \/ In June, I change my tune \/ In July, far, far I fly \/ In August, away! \/ I must.\u201d \u201cMoonrise Kingdom\u201d suggests that to leave the Kingdom of Childhood is to abandon it forever, a change as inevitable as the change of the seasons. As the sun sets on the Kingdom of Childhood, we cling to its dying light and fear the coolness of its shadow. Like Suzy and Sam, we cling to fantasy \u2014 to escapism from what we cannot escape.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><em>Daily Arts Writer Maya Ruder can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:mayarud@umich.edu\"><em>mayarud@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cFantastic Mr. Fox<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (2009)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>There\u2019s a wild, restless energy that runs beneath \u201cFantastic Mr. Fox,\u201d a kind of quiet rebellion that makes it more than just a kids\u2019 movie or an Anderson aesthetic piece. It\u2019s a story about instinct, about the parts of ourselves that crave freedom even when we\u2019ve built lives of comfort. Mr. Fox, voiced with sly wisdom by George Clooney, can\u2019t resist falling back into his stealing, not out of greed, but out of something deeper and harder to define: the need to feel alive.<\/p>\n<p>Every frame of this film has the feeling that it was treated by hand: textured, rough and perhaps a little too real. The stop-motion animation gives everything a tangible warmth, a feeling of a picture book come to life. Anderson populates the world with lovely autumn hues and deadpan humor, but lurking beneath is a real melancholy, and a feeling that to mature, to become civilized, is to sever the connection to something essential to who we are.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFantastic Mr. Fox\u201d is clever and funny, yes, but it\u2019s also strangely existential. It asks why we just can\u2019t seem to help ourselves from doing the things that get us in trouble, and why we just can\u2019t resist being who we are, even if it will kill us. One of Anderson\u2019s best films captures the fact that \u201cfantastic\u201d has nothing to do with being perfect; it has to do with embracing the wildness that makes us who we are.<\/p>\n<p><em>Daily Arts Writer Tiffany McKalko can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:tmckalko@umich.edu\"><em>tmckalko@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cThe Grand Budapest Hotel<em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/em> (2014)<\/strong> <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>While some may not agree that \u201cThe Grand Budapest Hotel\u201d is the best Anderson film, I think it\u2019ll come as no shock that it took the number one spot. In a way, \u201cThe Grand Budapest Hotel\u201d is the most high-Anderson you can get without losing a feeling of genuineness; it\u2019s really the last film Anderson made before his style became an imitation of itself.<\/p>\n<p>Smartly funny, and at times deceivingly sad, \u201cThe Grand Budapest Hotel\u201d follows the story of hotel concierge Monsieur Gustave H (Ralph Fiennes, \u201cConclave\u201d), his prot\u00e9g\u00e9 Zero Moustafa and the events that ensue when a priceless painting is left in Gustave\u2019s possession. Despite the sometimes-fantastical worlds in which an Anderson film can place a viewer, there\u2019s something real that beats beneath the surface of \u201cThe Grand Budapest Hotel.\u201d Truly, what I think separates this film from his later works is that, even though it\u2019s rich in style, it\u2019s even richer in heart.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, \u201cThe Grand Budapest Hotel\u201d is a film that represents peak Wes Anderson in its appearances, but it also represents peak Anderson in the story it aims to tell \u2014 one of friendship, loyalty and the importance of the connections that we form with others.<\/p>\n<p><em>Daily Arts Contributor Avalon Ring can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/film\/the-michigan-daily-ranks-wes-anderson-films\/mailto:avalonr@umich.edu\"><em>avalonr@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<aside>\n\t\t<\/aside>\n<p><h3 class=\"jp-relatedposts-headline\"><em>Related articles<\/em><\/h3>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><script async src=\"\/\/www.tiktok.com\/embed.js\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A number of magnificent auteurs broke out in the scene at the start of the 21st century. Blockbuster king Christopher Nolan has been dizzying and dazzling audiences since his debut, \u201cMemento,\u201d in 2000. Horror-turned-social-commentary powerhouse Bong Joon Ho finally got people paying attention with \u201cParasite,\u201d but he has been documenting the foibles of capitalism since [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3380,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[2222,653,2731,222,1172,2221],"class_list":{"0":"post-3379","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-entertainment","8":"tag-anderson","9":"tag-dailys","10":"tag-films","11":"tag-michigan","12":"tag-ranking","13":"tag-wes"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3379","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3379"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3379\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3381,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3379\/revisions\/3381"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3380"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}