{"id":3799,"date":"2025-11-24T03:49:04","date_gmt":"2025-11-24T03:49:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/2025\/11\/24\/wild-thing-sheds-new-light-on-a-controversial-artist\/"},"modified":"2025-11-24T03:49:16","modified_gmt":"2025-11-24T03:49:16","slug":"wild-thing-sheds-new-light-on-a-controversial-artist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/2025\/11\/24\/wild-thing-sheds-new-light-on-a-controversial-artist\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Wild Thing\u2019 sheds new light on a controversial artist"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Written alongside the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theartnewspaper.com\/2020\/09\/20\/rediscovered-paul-gauguin-manuscript-written-in-his-polynesian-hut-reveals-artists-hidden-secrets\">resurfacing<\/a> of Paul Gauguin\u2019s memoir and will, Sue Prideaux chronicles the controversial genius\u2019 life in \u201cWild Thing: A Life of Paul Gauguin.\u201d Having previously authored biographies of Friedrich Nietzsche, Edvard Munch and August Strindberg, Prideaux is comfortable synthesizing historical fact, criticism and a decades-long narrative. This well-researched account of Gauguin\u2019s life is supplemented by prints of the French artist\u2019s sketches, sculptures and paintings \u2014 displaying the beautiful intimacy of his canvases and the haunting darkness of his innovative wood-carvings.<\/p>\n<p>Prideaux seeks to complicate the narrative around an artist she describes as \u201cmisunderstood,\u201d who others label as a colonizer. Gauguin\u2019s revered status in art history is extensive: Hailed as the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.khederpaintings.com\/post\/primitive-art-by-paul-gauguin?srsltid=AfmBOoojT2DA7xcrhJu6fXRIBSz30Bw7klQJrf-xreLGfyMBdpEOuC7j\">father of Primitivism<\/a> and an apostle of Symbolism, the Post-Impressionist\u2019s influence is undeniable. Yet his role in fetishizing Polynesian natives and perpetuating French colonialism is a topic that museum exhibitions and the artist\u2019s admirers alike still grapple with. The author does not shy away from this discussion, but clearly seeks to sanitize \u2014 or at least add ambiguity to \u2014 his sullied legacy.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>After spending his early childhood in Peru, Gauguin felt out of place upon immigrating to France. This alienation strongly informed his creative choices, particularly his fascination with foreign artwork and forms. Gauguin\u2019s lifelong compulsion toward the the distant, which he perceived as exotic, culminated in him spending the last years of his life in Tahiti, painting and living among the island\u2019s inhabitants.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Prideaux contributes to the artist\u2019s canon by delving into how Gauguin resisted colonial powers in Polynesia, legally representing natives and starting a newspaper to champion their causes. However, these efforts are fundamentally overshadowed by his relationships with teenage Tahitians. This exploitation is inescapable when viewing Gauguin, as his work during this period features predominantly naked, idealized depictions of native women and girls.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"scaip scaip-1    \">\n\t\t<\/aside>\n<p>Prideaux\u2019s writing frames this fixation as admiration, rather than a fetishistic obsession. In reality, Gauguin\u2019s artistic motivations combine both an earnest curiosity and a perverted romanticization of Polynesian culture and people. When faced with the artist\u2019s work in a museum, we grapple with these two conflicting notions and come away with our own perspectives. But Prideaux\u2019s writing nudges us \u2014 perhaps as a response to recent <a href=\"https:\/\/hyperallergic.com\/1013935\/do-we-need-to-vindicate-paul-gauguin\/\">reevaluation of the artist\u2019s legacy<\/a> \u2014 to view him in an undeservedly positive light.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The author\u2019s inability to hide her admiration for Gauguin diminishes the entire reading experience. By rationalizing the artist\u2019s deplorable behavior abroad and indulging his messianic self-descriptions and self-serving sufferings, Prideaux comes across as Gauguin\u2019s cheerleader rather than his biographer. Her sycophantic writing begs the question: Does this book deepen our collective understanding of this painter\u2019s life and works, or just seek to salvage his image?<\/p>\n<p>In chronicling Gauguin\u2019s life, Prideaux paints a realistic picture through an idealized filter. The narrator is not entirely unreliable, but she is also not unbiased. Though Prideaux fawns over the artist\u2019s more admirable traits and palliates his worst ones \u2014 rationalizing Gauguin\u2019s behavior in Polynesia and waving away his failures as a father \u2014 she never paints the artist in black and white.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The author ultimately creates an ambiguous picture of Gauguin\u2019s persona, offering clear insight into one of the most dynamic periods of art history. From the painter\u2019s innovative school at Pont-Aven to his frayed relationship with Vincent Van Gogh \u2014 including Gauguin\u2019s interactions with masters such as Camille Pissarro and Edgar Degas \u2014 Prideaux covers a breadth of key episodes in the progression of Post-Impressionism.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, these moments are bogged down by long historical diatribes that come across more as self-absorbed displays of Prideaux\u2019s research than as something meant to truly enlighten the reader. Enjoyment of this biography heavily depends on the reader\u2019s interest in the time period, as expansive sections of the book offer no forward movement in the artist\u2019s life, instead focusing on historical background and concurrent events.\u00a0<\/p>\n<aside class=\"scaip scaip-2    \">\n\t\t<\/aside>\n<p>Still, Prideaux provides nuanced analysis of the artist\u2019s work, which is in conversation with the greater world of art critique. This examination is key to understanding the importance of Gauguin\u2019s contributions to modern art. Likewise, the author masterfully verbalizes Gauguin\u2019s integral struggle of seeking some new frontier \u2014 a key motif throughout the painter\u2019s life. By fully realizing this idea and illustrating its psychological impact on her subject, Prideaux allows readers to gain a deeper appreciation of Gauguin\u2019s oeuvre.<\/p>\n<p>Whether Prideaux succeeded in complicating the narrative of an already complex figure is unclear. This profile of the Post-Impressionist iconoclast offers in-depth research and mature art critique but shies away from properly condemning Gauguin\u2019s colonial sins. While it is difficult to grapple with the dissonance of admiring a deeply flawed artist\u2019s work, \u201cWild Thing\u201d offers a broader understanding of Gauguin\u2019s life and of his place in the canon of modern art.<\/p>\n<p><em>Daily Arts Writer Lorenzo Norbis can be reached at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.michigandaily.com\/arts\/books\/wild-thing-explores-paul-gauguins-life-in-more-than-black-and-white\/mailto:lnorbis@umich.edu\"><em>lnorbis@umich.edu<\/em><\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<aside>\n\t\t<\/aside>\n<p><h3 class=\"jp-relatedposts-headline\"><em>Related articles<\/em><\/h3>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Written alongside the resurfacing of Paul Gauguin\u2019s memoir and will, Sue Prideaux chronicles the controversial genius\u2019 life in \u201cWild Thing: A Life of Paul Gauguin.\u201d Having previously authored biographies of Friedrich Nietzsche, Edvard Munch and August Strindberg, Prideaux is comfortable synthesizing historical fact, criticism and a decades-long narrative. This well-researched account of Gauguin\u2019s life is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3800,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[2651,3759,882,3758,3757],"class_list":{"0":"post-3799","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-news","8":"tag-artist","9":"tag-controversial","10":"tag-light","11":"tag-sheds","12":"tag-wild"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3799","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3799"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3799\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3801,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3799\/revisions\/3801"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3800"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3799"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3799"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmbglobal.news\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3799"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}