<\/p>\n
The Fox television series \u201cDoc\u201d recently aired the finale of its second season, concluding its 22-episode, 8-month run. The show has all the trappings of a daytime medical drama: episode-long diagnostic mysteries, romance between coworkers and contrived moral dilemmas that force one to choose between intuition and risk avoidance. You\u2019ve seen it before. Consider the intra-circle romances of \u201cGrey\u2019s Anatomy\u201d<\/a>, the procedural predictability of rare patient disease presentation and their untraditional, unprofessional treatment pathways in \u201cHouse\u201d<\/a>. It is unrealistic. It is hokey. It is formulaic \u2014 in all the best ways.\u00a0<\/p>\n If this genre is not your style, you should not expect \u201cDoc\u201d to innovate beyond the format. In fact, the new season leans even further into the tropes of its predecessors. By centering specific patient cases in each episode, \u201cDoc\u201d shifts further from a narratively cohesive plot and closer to that of a traditional medical procedural drama.\u00a0<\/p>\n Overall, this strategy works in favor of the season\u2019s quality \u2014 there\u2019s a reason why the formula has been so successful. Even more realistic medical TV series like \u201cThe Pitt\u201d<\/a>, which has reached critical acclaim, rely on such tropes for audience entertainment. While \u201cThe Pitt\u201d is more factual in terms of the medical phenomena it portrays, it has captured national attention as a result of its soap-opera melodrama and personality-driven cast.\u00a0<\/p>\n These throughlines are further highlighted by the ways in which the new seasons of \u201cDoc\u201d and \u201cThe Pitt\u201d approach modern issues within the broader medical system. In general, this is done with little tact \u2014 and addressed quite directly \u2014 since our time with each patient is limited. While the goal of raising awareness surrounding topical debates, biases and conflicts within the medical field is culturally important, this method of incorporating sensitive topics can create a \u201cvery special episode\u201d<\/a> <\/strong>atmosphere, rather than that of a unique, thoughtful approach to heavy topics. However, given our limited expectations for medical procedural dramas (how much complexity can they really address in under an hour?), these instances feel more like an honorable attempt at provoking audience thought than a contrived device for sparking controversy.\u00a0<\/p>\n